GM. This is Milk Road PRO, unpacking how crypto went from trust-me-bro blowups to provable onchain trading.
In 2022, crypto ate its own.
Luna collapsed in May, wiping $40B from the market in a matter of days.
Losses peaked at $33B when Celsius and Three Arrows Capital fell next.
Celsius froze the accounts of 1.7M users and filed for bankruptcy.
FTX followed in November.
β οΈ By the end of that year, a generation of retail investors had been wrecked, not by bad trades, but by the products they trusted to hold their money.
The bigger problem was that they were centralized, controlled by people who hid risks, broke promises, and operated behind closed doors.
And because onchain alternatives were too slow and unreliable, traders had no real choice but to trust them - which is exactly what made the collapses possible.
Flash forward to now and the landscape has changed dramatically. Onchain protocols are a hit; they generate revenue and offer great products like perps.
And Lighter is well positioned to capitalize here - yet most people havenβt noticed yet.
Itβs a perps exchange built on Ethereum that:
- leverages its security.
- runs at the speed of a centralised exchange.
- handles thousands of transactions per second.
- settles in milliseconds.
Every single trade is cryptographically proven onchain. Not claimed. Proven.
In this report, weβll dive into Lighter and why itβs so dramatically undervalued.
The founder
Most reports start with the tech; this one starts with the person, because in Lighterβs case, the person is the alpha.
Most DeFi protocols are built by people who understand blockchains but have never sat inside a real trading system. They know the infrastructure, but not the pressure of being on the wrong side of a millisecond. That gap shows in the product.
Vlad Novakovski is different.
By his teens, he made the U.S. national teams for both the International Olympiad in Informatics and Physics. He entered Harvard at 16 and graduated early. At 18, he was recruited by Ken Griffin, founder of Citadel and one of the sharpest allocators in finance.
After Citadel, Novakovski spent nearly a decade as a portfolio manager at Graham Capital, then moved into tech, leading machine learning at Quora, becoming VP of Engineering at Addepar, and co-founding Lunchclub.
When Lunchclub stalled in 2022, he pivoted the entire company into Lighter and kept 80% of the team.
Lighter raised $21M in 2024, then $68M at a $1.5B valuation in 2025 from Founders Fund, Ribbit, Haun Ventures, and Robinhood. That last name matters: a consumer brokerage with 23M users that rarely makes venture bets, now backing an onchain exchange and lending its CEO as an advisor.
Founders Fund was explicit. Partner Joey Krug said the team was β85% to 90%β of the reason they invested.
Today, the token trades below that valuation.
π₯ The market is pricing Lighter below what the smartest money paid months ago.
So this is clearly not your typical crypto bro founder; Vlad is who built a product that is truly at the intersection of finance and code (and yes, I know everyone says that).
When DEX UX meets CEX UX
For years, a fast and fully verifiable order book was considered an unsolvable engineering problem.
The reason comes down to how cryptographic proofs work.
Every time you prove a computation with ZK proofs, you generate a mathematical certificate that confirms the result is correct.
- Simple computations are cheap to certify.
- Complex ones are slow, expensive, and at high frequency, often impractical.
Order books are about as complex as it gets.
Thousands of orders at different prices, placed at different times, all competing for priority.
π€― Finding the best price, checking who got there first, executing correctly, and doing all of that tens of thousands of times per second while also generating proof for every single operation, was a wall nobody had cleared.
Lighter cleared it by rethinking the data structure from the ground up.
Rather than building a fast order book and then trying to bolt provability on top, they designed the structure so that the best available price and the earliest order at that price always sit at a known, fixed location.
No searching. One predictable path through the tree every time.
The shorter and more predictable the path, the cheaper and faster the proof.
That insight is what makes the whole system possible.
The structure was designed to be provable first, and fast as a consequence.
π That is why Lighter can wrap hundreds of thousands of operations into a single compact proof without sacrificing speed.
The result is an app-specific ZK rollup built exclusively for high-frequency order book trading.
Here is how it works in practice:
- The sequencer receives your signed orders, queues them in strict first-in-first-out order, executes them, and packages everything into a batch.
- The prover takes that batch, generates a cryptographic proof covering every operation inside it, and posts it to Ethereum.
- Ethereum verifies the proof and updates the canonical state.
Every match, every liquidation, every state change is covered by that proof.
βYou do not have to trust that Lighter played fair.
β You can verify it yourself.
The proof either holds or it does not. There is no grey area, no back-room decision, no way to quietly reorder things in someone else's favour.
Most exchanges still have a black box somewhere, usually the matching engine, sitting offchain, processing orders in ways the user cannot audit.
That is precisely where trust breaks down and where, historically, it has been abused.
βοΈ With Lighter, the matching engine is the one thing that is impossible to fake, because it is the one thing being proven onchain.
And there is one more thing.
Your assets never leave Ethereum at any point.
They sit in smart contracts on L1, and the rollup operates as a fast, transparent computation layer on top.
If the sequencer ever goes offline, you do not need anyone's permission to leave. You reconstruct your account state from onchain data and withdraw directly to L1.
No intermediary. No waiting. No asking.
That is not a minor safety feature.
It is the trust model made concrete, and it is exactly what was missing from every centralised platform that collapsed.
The next logic question is how it stacks up compared to the one clear leader in the perpetual market today.
Lighter vs. Hyperliquid
The simplest way to understand the difference is to look at where the two systems sit and what they depend on.
Lighter is built on top of Ethereum.
It will never leave; meaning your assets live in smart contracts on Ethereum's L1, and every batch of trades gets proven and verified on Ethereum.
The rollup is a very fast computation layer that sits above a foundation it doesn't control.
Ethereum's security is not Lighter's to compromise.
Hyperliquid built its own foundation.
The chain, validators, consensus mechanism, and execution environment - it controls all of it.
That gives it something Lighter doesn't have: a full unified state.
When you trade on Hyperliquid, your trades and smart contracts exist in the same world in real time. No async gaps, no waiting for proofs. One coherent machine.
The trade-off is dependency.
If you want to leave Hyperliquid for Ethereum, you need a bridge.
That is a trust decision every time.
On Lighter, there is no bridge between you and your money.
If everything goes wrong, including the sequencer, there is an escape hatch that lets you withdraw directly to Ethereum L1 without asking anyone for permission.
On verifiability, there is no comparison.
Hyperliquid asks you to trust that its validators are honest.
Lighter proves it.
Everything has a proof that anyone can verify independently.
For traders who have been burned by opaque systems, that is not a small thing.
1οΈβ£ If you want maximum raw speed and a unified execution environment, and you are comfortable trusting a sovereign chain, Hyperliquid is excellent at what it does.
2οΈβ£ If you want Ethereum-grade security, cryptographic proof of fair execution, zero retail fees, and the ability to exit without anyone's help, Lighter is the more defensible long-term bet.
Especially if you believe that DeFi's future is built on Ethereum's liquidity and not on isolated chains.
Now that the architecture is clear, the question becomes whether it can sustain a real business.
Here is how the money works.
Uh, Ohβ¦ π§ The rest of this report is exclusive to PRO members!
Already a PRO member? Log in here.
WHATβS LEFT INSIDE? π
- How Lighter makes money, and why the business model is smarter than it looks.
- The one risk that could quietly derail everything before it gets its shot.
- The catalysts that could change the trajectory in the next twelve months.
- Where I stand, what I own, and what would make me change my mind.
Upgrade your subscription today to unlock access to all of the milky insights above, PLUS:
- Weekly reports to help you manage investments, allocate capital, take profits, and stay ahead in crypto. π
- Access to the PRO Community, where the Milk Road crew & 1000s of fellow PROs talk crypto. Donβt miss the monthly live events! π«
Already a PRO member? Log in here.
