5 Best Ethereum (ETH) Layer 2 (L2) Solutions - 2023

A curated list of ETH Layer 2 projects, plus what L2s are & how they work.

  • April 5, 2023
  • 2 Min Read

The Milk Road Promise

We’re committed to helping you get smart about crypto. Some articles feature products from partners who compensate us, but opinions are always our own.

Key Takeaways

  • Layer 2 solutions provide faster and cheaper transactions compared to the main Ethereum blockchain.
  • There are several Layer 2 blockchains that enjoy mass adoption.
  • Different Layer 2 technologies determine the tradeoffs between speed, security, and cost that the different solutions employ.

Top 5 Ethereum L2 Projects

Project

Daily Active Users

Transactions per Second

Platform Token

Total Value Locked (TVL)

Polygon (MATIC)

400,000

65,000

MATIC

$1.09 billion

Arbitrum

130,000

40,000

ARB

$2.22 billion

Optimism

40,000

2,000

OP

$900 million

StarkEx

N/A

N/A

None

$540 million

zkSync

N/A

N/A

None

$52 million

Polygon is one of the most popular Layer 2 solutions for Ethereum. It processes transactions for a wide range of trading applications, blockchain games, and more. In fact, large web2 companies such as Meta and Reddit rely on Polygon to power the blockchain-enabled parts of their applications.

Daily Active Users

400,000

Transactions per Second

65,000

Token

MATIC

TVL

$1.09 billion
  • Main Features

    Expand to learn more
    • 65,000 transactions per second
    • $0.018 average cost per transaction
    • Over 225 million unique Polygon addresses registered
  • Pros & Cons

    Expand to learn more

    Pros

    • Cheap, fast, and efficient blockchain that supports a wide range of use-cases
    • Over 400,000 daily active users
    • The project is supported by large names such as Coinbase Ventures

    Cons

    • Polygon’s proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism has been criticized for being too centralized in the past
    • Layer 2’s like Polygon are generally not quite as secure as the main Ethereum chain

Arbitrum is a rollup-based Layer 2 and also one of the biggest Ethereum scaling solutions. The Arbitrum airdrop in March of 2023 led to over $1 billion dollars of wealth creation for users of the platform as they all received free ARB tokens in their wallets.

Daily Active Users

130,000

Transactions per Second

40,000

Token

ARB

TVL

$2.22 billion
  • Main Features

    Expand to learn more
    • 3.9 million total users
    • Has its own virtual machine — the Arbitrum Virtual Machine
    • Over $2 billion in total value locked (TVL)
  • Pros & Cons

    Expand to learn more

    Pros

    • More than 3.9 million users
    • Large ecosystem that includes NFT marketplaces, blockchain games, stablecoins and much more.
    • Supported by some of the largest decentralized finance (DeFi) apps including 1inch, Aave, Balancer, and more

    Cons

    • Arbitrum is not a standalone chain and thus relies on the security of the underlying Ethereum chain in order to run
    • The optimistic rollup technology of Arbitrum means withdrawals of funds can take up to a week
Optimism

Optimism

Best for Ethereum Compatibility

Optimism is another popular rollup scaling solution for the Ethereum ecosystem. The project was started in 2019 and has since become one of the largest Layer 2 solutions, with a TVL of almost $1 billion.

Daily Active Users

40,000

Transactions per Second

2,000

Token

OP

TVL

$900 million
  • Main Features

    Expand to learn more
    • Over 40,000 daily active users
    • Home to one of the most popular crypto trading platforms, Synthetix
    • Very tightly integrated with Ethereum, boasting “If it works on Ethereum, it works on Optimism at a fraction of the cost.”
  • Pros & Cons

    Expand to learn more

    Pros

    • Has saved users over $1 billion in gas fees compared to Ethereum
    • Optimism “quests” allow users to earn bounties for learning about the Optimism ecosystem
    • The Optimism team has promised a “season of airdrops” for regular users

    Cons

    • Optimism currently uses a single “sequencer” to order transactions before submitting them to Ethereum, which introduces a significant level of centralization
    • “Optimistic rollup” technology is still quite new and not fully tested
StarkEx

StarkEx

Best for High Performance

StarkEx is a scaling solution that’s a bit different from the others on the list. It relies on “zero-knowledge proofs” which is a faster and more secure scaling mechanism. By using zero-knowledge proofs StarkEx can provide low gas fees and fast transactions without compromising on security.

Daily Active Users

N/A

Transactions per Second

N/A

Token

None

TVL

$540 million
  • Main Features

    Expand to learn more
    • Processed over $700 billion in trading volume
    • Processed over 290 million transactions
    • Over 90 million NFTs minted
  • Pros & Cons

    Expand to learn more

    Pros

    • Trusted by some of the most popular Ethereum projects including Sorare, ImmutableX, and dYdX
    • Has over 100,000 users
    • Batches transactions for much higher throughput

    Cons

    • Zero-knowledge proof technology is complex and may take a while for beginners to understand
    • Unlike many other Layer 2’s, StarkEx does not have a platform token you can buy and trade
zkSync

zkSync

Best for Security

zkSync is another Layer 2 that uses zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs to scale the Ethereum blockchain. zkSync is committed to not only scaling the speed of the Ethereum blockchain but preserving its values of freedom, self-sovereignty, and decentralization.

Daily Active Users

N/A

Transactions per Second

N/A

Token

None

TVL

$52 million
  • Main Features

    Expand to learn more
    • Makes no security compromises since it inherits 100% of Ethereum’s security features
    • Supports all Ethereum-based projects without requiring them to make any code changes
    • Has raised over $450 million in funding from notable investors such as a16z and Dragonfly
  • Pros & Cons

    Expand to learn more

    Pros

    • zkSync takes security seriously — bug bounties offer up to $2.3 million for revealing critical security flaws
    • All code is open-source which provides transparency and trust
    • Over 500,000 active user accounts

    Cons

    • zkSync’s emphasis on security means the platform is experiencing a slow roll-out
    • Not nearly as widely adopted as other Layer 2’s like Polygon and Arbitrum

What Are Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) Protocols?

Ethereum is one of the most popular blockchains. However, its focus on strict security and decentralization means that the blockchain can only process about 14 transactions per second. Because of this, Ethereum transaction costs are usually very high, and transactions can take a long time to process.

"Layer 2” solutions are blockchains built on top of (or in parallel with) the Ethereum blockchain that is used to scale its capabilities. These chains usually process many more transactions per second for much less in fees. In return, however, Layer 2 blockchains are usually more centralized and not as well-secured as the main “Layer 1” Ethereum chain.

As an analogy, you can imagine the Ethereum network as the US Postal Service — or the main government-owned postal courier in a country. It is reliable, secure, and available to everyone, but it often suffers from congestion, delays, and relatively high costs due to its wide reach and demand.

Layer 2’s, on the other hand, are like private delivery services. There are many more of them, and they can transfer packages faster and cheaper. On the other hand, they don’t have the credibility of the main postal service and may not be trusted by everyone to ship the most important packages.

Why Do We Need L2 Solutions?

Many popular blockchain projects are building their services on Layer 2 blockchains in order to provide their users with more affordable trading, gaming, lending, and much more. Large tech companies such as Reddit and Meta are opting to use Layer 2 solutions to bring their web3 offerings to the masses for a low cost.

The Ethereum blockchain has upcoming upgrades which will scale the capacity of the network. However, there are already several tried-and-true Layer 2 projects, and the bridges need to use them, that will most likely continue to see wide adoption even as the main Ethereum chain improves.

L1 Vs. L2

Layer 1

  • Average transaction fees are $5+
  • Transactions per second are limited to around 14
  • Security is a top priority that hampers the speed of the blockchain
  • Fully decentralized — cannot be changed or halted without mass consensus

Layer 2

  • Average transaction fees are less than $1
  • Can process potentially hundreds of thousands of transactions per second
  • Security is still very tight, but may sometimes be compromised in favor of speed
  • Some Layer 2 chains are much more centralized than Layer 1’s, leading to concerns about their reliability and independence

What Are Ethereum Rollups?

Optimism, Arbitrum, StarkEx, and zkSync are all examples of Ethereum “rollups.” A rollup is a type of Layer 2 scaling technology that processes transactions off-chain and then submits them all together in a “rollup” to the main Ethereum chain.

There are two types of rollups:

  • Optimistic rollups: Optimistic rollups assume that all transactions within the rollup are valid, and they are automatically submitted to the main Ethereum chain. If a transaction is not valid, there is a specific time window within which anyone can submit “fraud proof” that proves the transaction is incorrect. This allows the chain to process transactions quickly and only do extra work if a transaction is proven to be fraudulent. Arbitrum and Optimism are examples of Layer 2’s utilizing optimistic rollups.
  • Zero-knowledge rollups: Zero-knowledge, or “ZK,” rollups check every single transaction for validity before submitting it to the blockchain. These types of rollups use sophisticated cryptography and math known as “zero-knowledge proofs” in order to verify that each transaction is legitimate. Among decentralization and security purists, ZK rollups are the preferred Ethereum scaling mechanism. However, they are much more complicated than optimistic rollups and have not yet enjoyed as wide of adoption. StarkEx and zkSync are examples of Layer 2’s utilizing zero-knowledge rollups.

To Sum It Up

Ethereum sees tons of demand and Layer 2’s are here to help scale the blockchain and make it accessible to everyone. While the technologies are still in their infancy, Layer 2’s such as Polygon and Arbitrum are already seeing wide adoption, while ZK-based Layer 2’s like StarkEx and zkSync promise cheaper transactions with no impact on security.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are ETH L2 tokens?

    Expand to learn more

    L2 tokens are the platform tokens for Layer 2 blockchains such as Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism.

    L2 tokens trade just like any other cryptocurrency token, meaning they may go up or down in price.


  • What are the ETH L2 fees?

    Expand to learn more

    L2 fees are generally much lower than the fees on Ethereum Mainnet. For example, the average fee on Polygon is $0.018 per transaction, compared to $5+ on Ethereum.

  • What is the best Ethereum L2?

    Expand to learn more

    It’s difficult to say that any single L2 is the best. It really depends on what you’re looking for. For wide adoption and fast transactions, L2’s like Polygon and Arbitrum are good choices.

    If security and decentralization is very important to you, then zero-knowledge rollups like StarkEx and zkSync may be good choices.


Contributors

  • Avatar of George Hristov

    George is a tech writer interested in web3 startups and communities. In the dynamic world of crypto, he stays plugged in to the day-to-day headlines, deep dives, and industry commentary.

  • Avatar of Shannon Ullman

    Shannon Ullman is the managing editor for Milk Road. She specializes in cryptocurrency and personal finance content. Her work has appeared in publications like Insider Inc.

Get smarter about crypto

Join 250,000+ subscribers and get our 5 min daily newsletter on what matters in crypto.